CineStill 800T: General Impressions
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEif44pawGUbJqk_oR3wKKxqBINHrIE6_H36h7gSozP4LWq06nLg65wl4ByfcsqITJRaIOe8Zq0Lp6bh3w71MstsHEhygS3zyzhOr0WtaCxa6DYJ7CVr3byvjSADdZQq4l2eny-iD1pdQH9n/s640/2015_SF_SJ_Cinestill_800T.jpg)
Generally there isn't too much exciting happening with films. Mostly the less popular ones go away, but the people at CineStill have done something fun. They've taken a few of the newest stocks from Kodak and did a good job repackaging it for normal color chemistry and use. The one that had the most interest to me was the 800Tungsten . It's pretty much the VISION3 500T stock use for cinema (You can see the 5219 markings on the negatives), but it's had the REMJET removed making it safe for C-41 processing. The question I had was what is it like to shoot, and is it worth the extra expense a roll. I had a hard time finding details of the sorts of quirks of this film, so I thought I would share my own experience. ISO 800 or ISO 400 First I would say I am not sure I agree with the speed rating. The very first roll I shot at 800 and felt generally the results were on the underexposed side. It doesn't make or break a shot, but generally shooting at